Flying Junior, you always have something to say that is worth reading.

Here is a tentative determination that might help explains the Ann Coulter debate:

Please note that at this point this can only be speculation:

Apparently, starting at note #46, one of your listeners had listened to your boss interview Ann Coulter on his morning show, and he was not impressed with what she said. Perhaps there were some loony questions asked and some equally loony answers given.

Said listener noted that Coulter’s lunacy corresponded to a full moon.

Anyway, there might be some guilt or perplexity on his part because he is attracted to her body but not to her head. Yet this is really not that unusual to have a person attracted to body and not mind—it happens on both sides the isle—actually quite frequently.

I suspect however that this individual was equally being affected by the full moon’s gravitational pull. If you have been in the psychotherapy business as long as I have—you know that certain minds are more sensitive to various stresses than are others. The brain has a higher level of liquid pulp—as well as the inner ear canals—that affect one’s balance. On the full moon the sensitive are more prone to act out or get a bit maniacal. This behavior will likely subside with the waning of the moon.

If for some unlikely reason this guy continues to go further and further out into space then it could be some breakdown—“fatigue” I think is your word. People vary quite a bit. It could be any number of things adding stress. Too much political reality. Not enough social engagement. General alientation. Global warming or heat spells. Adjusting to city life. Not taking one’s medication or using substances. Who knows?

But one thing is for sure—he is a pig poke in the mud as he refuses to succumb to political and social pressures. And he maintains cogent arguments as to why. I suspect he is fatigued of the politically correct pressures by people he considers self-righteous.

Or perhaps, and this is only a long shot, he is at some level of creativity that he inadvertently intimidates people so that he finds himself attracted to woman that seem immune to his influence. Ann Coulter would fit such a bill. She would likely be impervious to any rational argument. That could provide the stability of a valence. Again who knows?

But I have to agree with him—she does have nice legs.

Anyway—so much for speculations.

However what is even more interesting is the number of others that have entered the fray—including Hollywood stars! I’m impressed.

Dr. Donald

The agreement provides access to safe, reliable fuel sources for nuclear reactors and demonstrates what the Bush Administration calls Saudi leadership as a non-proliferation model for the region.

The kingdom also joins an international alliance to combat the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials, including delivery systems.

God help us if McCain wins in November.

I just threw up a little bit.

Since when do I need to be all politically correct just to think about some prurient action. You meathead? Apparently some pseudo-liberal, pseudo-intellectual types think one should be some kind of Hamlet and only have hormones for the high-minded.

Well guess what buddy—if physical attraction was such a noble art then why are there so many bad couples, bad marriages, and mediocre spirits haunting this planet—huh?

Like I’ve told haughty feminists—men did not create sexual interests—they inherited their passions. So stop condemning me for the lust of God’s green earth.

It was illiberality that has tried to impose its supercilious political correctness on us mere mortal anima. When are highbrows going to lay off the conceits of pseudo-elitism?